Journalists are not paid informants of police

– Rajesh Devanahalli

Mangalore is once again in limelight for a wrong reason. Three years ago, the hooligans of pro-Hindu organisation attacked on a pub in Mangalore and assaulted girls in the guise of protecting ‘Indian culture’. The attackers did not clarify if ‘assaulting women’ is also part of ‘Indian culture’.

The police and advocates for Hindu Jagaran Vedike in particular and the BJP in general are trying to divert the issue by repeating baseless arguments. First the attackers and their supporters termed it a ‘rave party’. One of the victims in the incident had to come out with his birth certificate before the cameras to prove that Saturday happened to be his birthday and his friends had gathered to greet him.

ADGP (Law and Order) Bipin Gopalakrishna also clarified that it was not a rave party. No banned goods seized, except beer no other drink was served in the party. God knows, who informed these hooligans that a rave party starts at 6.30 pm that too in a homestay!

Any child can understand these facts. But people like Pramila Nesargi, former legislator and advocate, Jagadish Karanth, state convener of Hindu Jagaran Vedike and many so called supporters of hooligans can’t digest these facts. A few people taking part in TV debates try to divert the issue stating that the homestay had no licence. It is a different issue altogether. Homestay authorities’ failure to obtain licence does not warrant an attack on youth celebrating a birthday party there.

The police have filed a case against Newz 24 reporter Navin Soorinje along with the attackers. According the police the crime he committed was ‘not informing the police’ well before the event took place. The police are behaving as if the journalists are paid servants of police. No journalist expects the police inform the journalist before reaching the crime spot. Similarly, they should not expect the journalists inform them. Journalists’ duty is to inform their heads and send the reports.

In this incident as Navin himself explained in detail, he tried to contact the concerned police officer, who did not receive the call. He also made one of his friends call the same officer, but no response. They had done this out of concern for the girls attacked in the incident, though it was not their duty.

It seems the police showed extra excitement to book him by drawing a comparison between the homestay attack with what happened in Assam recently. A local channel reporter in Assam had recorded molestation of a girl in public for 45 minutes. The incident attracted criticism across the country forcing the editor quit the post. However, this is not similar to what happened in Mangalore.

As Navin Soorinje wrote, commissioner of police Seemanth Kumar Singh wanted to ‘teach Navin a lesson’ for criticising the incident by comparing it to Taliban attitude. The commissioner is not ready to accept the fact that Taliban culture is very much in practice in his city.

Senior journalist Dinesh Amin Mattu in his Monday column in Prajavani pointed out that the number of policemen in a city like Mangalore is many times more than the number of reporters. Besides, the police have intelligence staff. Why can’t the police chief admit failure of his intelligence in the city? It demands no greater intelligence to understand that police intelligence staff has to have sources in the outfits like Hindu Jagarana Vedike, particularly in cities like Mangalore, to pre-empt their acts and take necessary measures to avoid them. The intelligence in Mangalore failed in 2009 and now as well.

The only ways left to the police to avoid such attacks in future are – arrest all those involved in the attack, book serious cases, pursue them seriously and ensure that they are found guilty in the court of law, as they are already proved to be guilty beyond doubt in public glare.

1 thought on “Journalists are not paid informants of police

  1. h pattabhirama somayaji

    seemanthkumar singh and his department, notorious for hosting the rss website as their own, have never done anything to commend themselves to the public. he is targeting naveen because 1. he can coverup his failure 2. he can please his sangh parivar bosses 3. he can teach all upright journalists a deadly lesson.
    let all of us sane people stand by naveen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.